EU vs Sam Rainsy

July 30, 2008

The European Union is calling Sam Rainsy a liar.

“I would say that on the basis of the provisional results published so far, CPP very clearly has a large majority and therefore any irregularities would have to be of a very large scale to invalidate the result,” Martin Callanan, chief observer for the EU mission told the media in Phnom Penh on Tuesday.

“While it is fair to say we have some evidence of irregularities these are not of such significant scale,” he said.

[...]

“Every vote is important,” said Tom Andrews, a senior advisor to the National Democratic Institute, which worked with NICFEC on the audit and on training observers placed in 378 of the country’s 1,245 polling stations.

“But we need to base our conclusion on the evidence we have seen in the audit and our observers did not show what has been suggested by the opposition,’’ Andrews said. “It showed that people had been taken from the list but that the number was small and there was no clear pattern.”

4 Responses to “EU vs Sam Rainsy”


  1. [...] vote-buying (it was an election, after all), but to complain that the entire election was stolen? DetailsAreSketchy reports on the European Union’s smackdown. See also KJE’s post, “He Just Doesn’t Get It.” You want to see real [...]

  2. jimmy riddle Says:

    given that the EU report was based in part on evidence given to them by the SRP it seems unlikely that they would call him a liar, in fact the report was scathing, and the SRP welcomed it. Seems an odd angle to take EU vs Sam Rainsy ..?

  3. jimmy riddle Says:

    you can dload the report here and make up ur own minds:

    http://www.eueomcambodia.org/English/Preliminary.html

    Cheers

  4. JR Says:

    It isn’t so much that Martin Callahan is calling SR a liar but that Sam Rainsy loses that bit of credibility he has by his clearly outrageous claims. Just imagine: 1 million voter were disenfranchised – out of a total of 8.1 million registered voters. The country only has a population of 14 million. Voter turnout was 70% or 5.67 million voters. So SR is saying that actually 6.67 million or 82.3% actually wanted to vote? Or how does his math work?


Leave a Reply